<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What If It Was Free?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frugillionaire.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frugillionaire.com/?p=282</link>
	<description>How to Live Richly and Save a Fortune</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:56:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.frugillionaire.com/?p=282&#038;cpage=1#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frugillionaire.com/?p=282#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Actually, &quot;if it was free,&quot; for those who use the subjunctive (not everyone does), is a genuine consideration of the actual possibility that it had been free: &quot;If it was free, why did we pay for it?&quot; The items you list in fact are not and have not been free for you; the point is not that it&#039;s theoretically impossible for them to be free but that, since they aren&#039;t and weren&#039;t, their being free is contrary to fact. So, for instance, Tevye in The Fiddler on the Roof is not a rich man (just as a facny car or a giant flat-screen TV are not and have not been free for you, so you are not considering the possibility that they may have been free in the past). He sings &quot;If I were a rich man.&quot; If, as a subjunctive user, he were to sing &quot;If I was a rich man,&quot; it would be because someone was saying he used to be one, or he just can&#039;t remember whether he was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, &#8220;if it was free,&#8221; for those who use the subjunctive (not everyone does), is a genuine consideration of the actual possibility that it had been free: &#8220;If it was free, why did we pay for it?&#8221; The items you list in fact are not and have not been free for you; the point is not that it&#8217;s theoretically impossible for them to be free but that, since they aren&#8217;t and weren&#8217;t, their being free is contrary to fact. So, for instance, Tevye in The Fiddler on the Roof is not a rich man (just as a facny car or a giant flat-screen TV are not and have not been free for you, so you are not considering the possibility that they may have been free in the past). He sings &#8220;If I were a rich man.&#8221; If, as a subjunctive user, he were to sing &#8220;If I was a rich man,&#8221; it would be because someone was saying he used to be one, or he just can&#8217;t remember whether he was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amber</title>
		<link>http://www.frugillionaire.com/?p=282&#038;cpage=1#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frugillionaire.com/?p=282#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Interesting - I never knew the intricate set of rules behind the English subjective. And now I&#039;ve found a great new blog. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting &#8211; I never knew the intricate set of rules behind the English subjective. And now I&#8217;ve found a great new blog. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frugillionaire</title>
		<link>http://www.frugillionaire.com/?p=282&#038;cpage=1#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Frugillionaire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frugillionaire.com/?p=282#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your note, Amber!

That&#039;s a tricky one. My understanding is that the subjunctive (&quot;were&quot;) should be used when the condition is untrue or impossible. For example, &quot;If the earth were flat, one could fall off the edge.&quot;

However, since this post posits a situation in which the condition becomes reality (such as in the case of a sweepstakes winner), I believe the indicative (&quot;was&quot;) is the proper form.

Here&#039;s an example in which the condition could be a reality: &quot;We couldn&#039;t find a price tag, and wondered if it was free.&quot;

Following is one of the sources I used to research this:

http://sesquiotic.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/if-i-were-using-the-subjunctive/

If this is incorrect, I&#039;d love if you (or anyone else) could provide further clarification on the matter. I always welcome a good grammar discussion. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your note, Amber!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a tricky one. My understanding is that the subjunctive (&#8221;were&#8221;) should be used when the condition is untrue or impossible. For example, &#8220;If the earth were flat, one could fall off the edge.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, since this post posits a situation in which the condition becomes reality (such as in the case of a sweepstakes winner), I believe the indicative (&#8221;was&#8221;) is the proper form.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an example in which the condition could be a reality: &#8220;We couldn&#8217;t find a price tag, and wondered if it was free.&#8221;</p>
<p>Following is one of the sources I used to research this:</p>
<p><a href="http://sesquiotic.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/if-i-were-using-the-subjunctive/" rel="nofollow">http://sesquiotic.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/if-i-were-using-the-subjunctive/</a></p>
<p>If this is incorrect, I&#8217;d love if you (or anyone else) could provide further clarification on the matter. I always welcome a good grammar discussion. <img src='http://www.frugillionaire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amber</title>
		<link>http://www.frugillionaire.com/?p=282&#038;cpage=1#comment-255</link>
		<dc:creator>amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frugillionaire.com/?p=282#comment-255</guid>
		<description>Just a friendly editing note -- to be grammatically correct, the title should read, &quot;What if it were Free?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a friendly editing note &#8212; to be grammatically correct, the title should read, &#8220;What if it were Free?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francine Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.frugillionaire.com/?p=282&#038;cpage=1#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Francine Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frugillionaire.com/?p=282#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Ellen! You&#039;ve made some really good points--you&#039;re right, if the year&#039;s supply of something wasn&#039;t delivered all at once, it sounds much more attractive. :-)

But for argument&#039;s sake, what if you couldn&#039;t re-sell the items? Would you still want the burden of ownership, along with the associated expenses (say, the higher utility bills of a large house, or increased insurance and maintenance fees of a luxury car)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Ellen! You&#8217;ve made some really good points&#8211;you&#8217;re right, if the year&#8217;s supply of something wasn&#8217;t delivered all at once, it sounds much more attractive. <img src='http://www.frugillionaire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But for argument&#8217;s sake, what if you couldn&#8217;t re-sell the items? Would you still want the burden of ownership, along with the associated expenses (say, the higher utility bills of a large house, or increased insurance and maintenance fees of a luxury car)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen</title>
		<link>http://www.frugillionaire.com/?p=282&#038;cpage=1#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frugillionaire.com/?p=282#comment-208</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d take most of those things and plan to re-sell them. 

I wouldn&#039;t mind the designer wardrobe, simply because that stuff tends to fit well and be of excellent quality. 

And a year&#039;s supply of gas or groceries? Fantastic! They give you credit, so you don&#039;t have to buy it all at once, obviously, and what a wonderful way to cut down on a necessary expense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d take most of those things and plan to re-sell them. </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind the designer wardrobe, simply because that stuff tends to fit well and be of excellent quality. </p>
<p>And a year&#8217;s supply of gas or groceries? Fantastic! They give you credit, so you don&#8217;t have to buy it all at once, obviously, and what a wonderful way to cut down on a necessary expense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
